Spokane Spokesman-Review, April 4, 1980: Difference between revisions
(+Washington publications) |
(formatting / +browser +tags) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{:Spokane Spokesman-Review index}} | {{:Spokane Spokesman-Review index}} | ||
{{:Washington publications index}} | {{:Washington publications index}} | ||
{{:US publications by state index}} | |||
{{Bibliography article header}} | {{Bibliography article header}} | ||
<center><h3> Get Happy!! </h3></center> | <center><h3> Get Happy!! </h3></center> | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
<center> Tom Sowa </center> | <center> Tom Sowa </center> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{3of4stars}} | |||
{{Bibliography text}} | {{Bibliography text}} | ||
If Elvis Costello wasn't such a talented songwriter, you could dismiss this effort as a case of New Wave overkill. Costello and the Attractions have combined with producer Nick Lowe to put 20 songs on ''Get Happy!!'' with the result that you're left, on first listen, with the impression Costello is pulling someone's leg. | If Elvis Costello wasn't such a talented songwriter, you could dismiss this effort as a case of New Wave overkill. Costello and the Attractions have combined with producer Nick Lowe to put 20 songs on ''Get Happy!!'' with the result that you're left, on first listen, with the impression Costello is pulling someone's leg. | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
Brief, as in 15 tunes shorter than 2½ minutes, and only two, (both dazzlers, however) longer than 3:30. | Brief, as in 15 tunes shorter than 2½ minutes, and only two, (both dazzlers, however) longer than 3:30. | ||
Yet, after a couple listens, all becomes clearer, if not more satisfying. Working against the grain, Costello has left all 20 cuts intact on ''Get Happy!!'' when he could easily have taken half of them, polished them and turned out another commercially successful LP, like his previous Armed Forces which reached the top 10. Costello, who thrives on an offbeat image, needed something like ''Get Happy!!'' to thumb his nose at the recording industry. | Yet, after a couple listens, all becomes clearer, if not more satisfying. Working against the grain, Costello has left all 20 cuts intact on ''Get Happy!!'' when he could easily have taken half of them, polished them and turned out another commercially successful LP, like his previous ''Armed Forces'' which reached the top 10. Costello, who thrives on an offbeat image, needed something like ''Get Happy!!'' to thumb his nose at the recording industry. | ||
Content-wise, Costello hasn't changed much. Despite the boisterous title, Costello isn't reveling in life's little pleasures. Never one to come right out and get political, he's more comfortable with a chilly British cynicism that doesn't allow much room for emotion, much less romance. | Content-wise, Costello hasn't changed much. Despite the boisterous title, Costello isn't reveling in life's little pleasures. Never one to come right out and get political, he's more comfortable with a chilly British cynicism that doesn't allow much room for emotion, much less romance. | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
This is good enough for any New Wave fan. However, if you still want to discover Costello, try either of his first three discs. This one's but a three-star special: it's fun, but too weak to earn four stars. | This is good enough for any New Wave fan. However, if you still want to discover Costello, try either of his first three discs. This one's but a three-star special: it's fun, but too weak to earn four stars. | ||
{{cx}} | |||
{{tags}}[[Get Happy!!]] {{-}} [[The Attractions]] {{-}} [[Nick Lowe]] {{-}} [[Motel Matches]] {{-}} [[Alison]] {{-}} [[My Aim Is True]] {{-}} [[Opportunity]] {{-}} [[Riot Act]] {{-}} [[New Amsterdam]] {{-}} [[Temptation]] | |||
{{cx}} | {{cx}} | ||
Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
{{Bibliography notes}} | {{Bibliography notes}} | ||
{{Bibliography next | |||
|prev = Spokane Spokesman-Review, March 7, 1980 | |||
|next = Spokane Spokesman-Review, November 21, 1980 | |||
}} | |||
'''The Spokesman-Review, April 4, 1980 | '''The Spokesman-Review, April 4, 1980 | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 39: | Line 46: | ||
{{Bibliography images}} | {{Bibliography images}} | ||
[[image:1980-04-04 Spokane Spokesman-Review clipping 01.jpg| | [[image:1980-04-04 Spokane Spokesman-Review clipping 01.jpg|380px]] | ||
<br><small>Clipping.</small> | <br><small>Clipping.</small> | ||
Line 49: | Line 56: | ||
*[http://www.spokesman.com/ Spokesman.com] | *[http://www.spokesman.com/ Spokesman.com] | ||
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokane_Spokesman_Review Wikipedia: Spokane Spokesman-Review] | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokane_Spokesman_Review Wikipedia: Spokane Spokesman-Review] | ||
*[http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=o_tLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Qu4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4660%2C1494641 news.google.com] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Spokane Spokesman-Review 1980-04-04}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Spokane Spokesman-Review 1980-04-04}} |
Latest revision as of 14:52, 25 March 2021
|