All Music Guide's North Review

Pretty self-explanatory
Post Reply
johnfoyle
Posts: 14871
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:37 pm
Location: Dublin , Ireland

All Music Guide's North Review

Post by johnfoyle »

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=am ... 867u5030jh
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

North, Elvis Costello's 20th album of new material, follows the deliberately classicist When I Was Cruel by a mere year, but it feels more the sequel to 1998's Burt Bacharach collaboration, Painted From Memory, or even 1993's roundly ignored classical pop experiment, The Juliet Letters.

Costello has abandoned clanging guitars and drums of Cruel — abandoned rock & roll, really — to return to a set of classically influenced songs, all "composed, arranged and conducted" by the man himself (on The Juliet Letters, he was merely the composer and voice). The songs on North are pitched halfway between traditional torch ballads and arty contemporary Broadway writers such as Stephen Sondheim. This isn't so much a shift in direction after When I Was Cruel as much as it is an extension of the Bacharach album (in this context, Cruel seems like the aberration), but it's also a reflection of Costello's new love for Canadian jazz singer Diana Krall.

It's not just that North is somewhat of a song cycle, starting with the despair of a failed relationship and ending with the hope of a new love, but that it's somewhat written in the style of Krall's music: self-consciously sophisticated and slightly jazzy. Ultimately, North is not jazz-pop; it's classical pop, with Costello more interested in the structure, arrangement, and words of the song rather than mere catchiness. It's a very writerly album, in regards to both the music and lyrics. Consequently, it takes a bit of effort to get into the album, since it purposefully lacks hooks and songs as immediate or tuneful as those on Painted From Memory or "Jacksons, Monk and Rowe" from The Juliet Letters. This is not a flaw, per se — it's simply what the album is, a collection of subtle songs performed with an elegant understatement.

Unlike The Juliet Letters, North never feels like an exercise, nor does it feel like Costello has something to prove. It's a specific, personal album with serious ambitions that it fulfills. If the album ultimately winds up being something to listen to on occasion rather than a record to spin repeatedly, that doesn't make Costello's achievement with this song cycle any less admirable.

[North was initially released with a bonus DVD containing three performances, all shot on a rather ridiculous soundstage with a rustic tree that spills over to a weathered upright piano that also sports weeds running across the keyboard. Costello plunks out three tunes on this slightly out-of-tune instrument, most notably "North," which didn't make it onto the album — possibly because it was catchier than the rest of the record, which would then draw more attention to the record's deliberate lack of tunes. It's nice to have, and it's also available through a rather cumbersome promotional download only available if you have the PIN number included with the CD. But, really, the DVD is not something even die-hard Costello fans would watch often.]

Stephen Thomas Erlewine
User avatar
Jackson Monk
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:33 pm
Location: At the other end of the telescope

Post by Jackson Monk »

The DVD is a bit od a disappointment to me. The miming to Still is accentuated by the fact that he sings the other tracks live (and a bit flat IMHO).
User avatar
LessThanZero
Posts: 1119
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 10:26 pm
Location: Kalamazoo
Contact:

Post by LessThanZero »

the part about the Quebecan animals cracked me up. I think it was that sly look he shoots the camera.
Loving this board since before When I Was Cruel.
Post Reply